SEC Shorts is back

Started by buff2.0, Jun 21, 2023, 08:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Show-Me Hog

Quote from: BleedinRed on Dec 07, 2023, 09:44 AMI can't believe anyone actually thinks FSU is one of the four best teams in the country.  I can comprehend why there is even a conversation about this. 

They are one of three undefeated teams that played a major conference schedule. Therefore, based on the empirical evidence, I believe they're one of the three best teams in the nation. You and the committee have no objective reason to believe otherwise. You may have an OPINION they're not, but we all know what opinions are worth, and the evidence says otherwise.

BASS

Quote from: BleedinRed on Dec 07, 2023, 09:44 AMI can't believe anyone actually thinks FSU is one of the four best teams in the country.  I can comprehend why there is even a conversation about this. 

Give them Travis back and I'd pick them 7th in a who'd you bet on to win a neutral site game. I'd pick Oregon, Georgia, bama, and Ohio State over FSU. I would pick them over Texas with Travis.
Fuck your feelings
Ain't found a way to kill me yet
I have hawgtism

Son of Spam

Quote from: BleedinRed on Dec 07, 2023, 09:44 AMI can't believe anyone actually thinks FSU is one of the four best teams in the country.  I can comprehend why there is even a conversation about this. 
What about Georgia?
Well, shit...

TC

Quote from: Texzilla on Dec 06, 2023, 11:30 PMHere's the main mental hurdle.  ESPN paid for the event and they're bringing the folks they want.  It's about money. All big time college sports are about is money. Dont like it go watch D3.  It's about to be nothing more than money.  So we need the money and benefit with Bama in there.  Don't care that fsu got passed over.  They can go fuck off.  I hope Bama beats the shit out of fucking cheating Michigan. 

Well there ya go. It's ALL about the money now, with rankings and record as just tertiary ideas.

Yes, it's a farce, but still, fuck FSU anyway because...money.

At least you didn't try that goofy argument, "but their QB is hurt!!1!"


Thin Red Swine

Quote from: BASS on Dec 07, 2023, 11:22 AMGive them Travis back and I'd pick them 7th in a who'd you bet on to win a neutral site game. I'd pick Oregon, Georgia, bama, and Ohio State over FSU. I would pick them over Texas with Travis.

So we should skip ALL the playoffs and just pick the winner.

BASS

Quote from: Thin Red Swine on Dec 07, 2023, 03:12 PMSo we should skip ALL the playoffs and just pick the winner.

When you only have 4 playoff spots and 8 teams you have to decide where and how to split the hairs
Fuck your feelings
Ain't found a way to kill me yet
I have hawgtism

Thin Red Swine

Quote from: BASS on Dec 07, 2023, 04:01 PMWhen you only have 4 playoff spots and 8 teams you have to decide where and how to split the hairs

See? You're biased against Cornrows, too.

DirkPiggler

Quote from: BleedinRed on Dec 07, 2023, 09:44 AMI can't believe anyone actually thinks FSU is one of the four best teams in the country.  I can comprehend why there is even a conversation about this. 

The problem is that no one uses any objective measure to determine who plays in the playoff. 

We all had criticisms of the BCS formula, but at least it was an objective number that was difficult to impossible for the TV rights holders and the conference commissioners to manipulate.  If we still had some sort of formula instead of a committee full of stakeholders and their inherent biases then there would still be bitching, but it would have less merit.  Whether intentional or otherwise, those choosing the teams consider tradition, conference affiliation, and TV viewership.  None of those should be valid criteria for picking the four best or most deserving teams. 

Applying the BCS formula to this year's teams would have resulted in the following:

1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. Alabama
4. Florida State

It would just be a different group bitching had this been the result, but "that's how the computer ranked them" would have been a better justification than "well, we don't think this team with a better record was as good as this one because their QB is injured."

Perish peacefully in a warm environment.

buff2.0

And that would have pissed off Texas, and that's what I was ok with.
"That's embarrassing.  Looks like Josh Duggar the first time his parents asked him to babysit."

For $7 mil I'll put a webcam in front of my shitter so I can answer fan questions while I drop the Longhorns off in College Station.

Once authored a post that critics claimed, "Was notaslibro level."

Vito Porkleone

Quote from: buff2.0 on Dec 08, 2023, 09:49 AMAnd that would have pissed off Texas, and that's what I was ok with.

bigpig

Quote from: buff2.0 on Dec 08, 2023, 09:49 AMAnd that would have pissed off Texas, and that's what I was ok with.
Lurker since 2003. Member since 2004.

Thin Red Swine

Re: Texas, there was an old precedent that could've been used to leave them out. There were times in the past where a "big win" early in the season was discounted because it was so early in the season.

That's what I think should've happened.





Texzilla

Quote from: DirkPiggler on Dec 08, 2023, 09:18 AMThe problem is that no one uses any objective measure to determine who plays in the playoff. 

We all had criticisms of the BCS formula, but at least it was an objective number that was difficult to impossible for the TV rights holders and the conference commissioners to manipulate.  If we still had some sort of formula instead of a committee full of stakeholders and their inherent biases then there would still be bitching, but it would have less merit.  Whether intentional or otherwise, those choosing the teams consider tradition, conference affiliation, and TV viewership.  None of those should be valid criteria for picking the four best or most deserving teams. 

Applying the BCS formula to this year's teams would have resulted in the following:

1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. Alabama
4. Florida State

It would just be a different group bitching had this been the result, but "that's how the computer ranked them" would have been a better justification than "well, we don't think this team with a better record was as good as this one because their QB is injured."



But it's not a real playoff.  It's a made for TV event, a reality show based on college football.  ESPN paid for it and wants the four teams they believe will deliver the most eyeballs for these three games.  They do have to sell the teams in as part of the "story", so there is no way in hell they would exclude the SEC unless the best teams both had 2 losses.  No way they exclude Michigan despite the cheating thing.  They had no plausible way to exclude Washington though they like to; they have zero audience.  Texas rings the bell.  And there you go.  Sorry your number didn't pull up FSU, it's show business. 

The future eventually will set for the SEC/big superconference.  Divisions that play thru a structured playoff like the nfl.  Where shitty division winners get in ahead of teams with better records but that's the structure. 

buff2.0

"That's embarrassing.  Looks like Josh Duggar the first time his parents asked him to babysit."

For $7 mil I'll put a webcam in front of my shitter so I can answer fan questions while I drop the Longhorns off in College Station.

Once authored a post that critics claimed, "Was notaslibro level."


Hogworth Ballington III


Lurk

Quote from: buff2.0 on Jan 03, 2024, 10:30 AM
The end of it was pretty good.  Wtf with  the Herbstreit ending? They've always been stupid, but...
"Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times."

Texzilla

The worst episode they've ever done.  I do like the callers hating on fucking Michigan.

buff2.0

Should have been more Big 10 teams calling to insult Michigan
"That's embarrassing.  Looks like Josh Duggar the first time his parents asked him to babysit."

For $7 mil I'll put a webcam in front of my shitter so I can answer fan questions while I drop the Longhorns off in College Station.

Once authored a post that critics claimed, "Was notaslibro level."

Thin Red Swine

Quote from: buff2.0 on Jan 03, 2024, 04:43 PMShould have been more Big 10 teams calling to insult Michigan

Yeah, that actually had good potential as a premise. Maybe they were hungover when they wrote it.